![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State Budget UpdateProposed FY 2008-09 State BudgetGovernor's Transportation Budget Mostly Avoids Large Reductions
January 11, 2008 The above action on the “spillover” funding is consistent with language contained in last year’s budget trailer bills. The ramification of this fund shift is to reduce funding available for intercity rail and transit capital improvements in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and it reduces funding available for the State Transit Assistance (STA) program — the only statewide monies available for transit operating expenses. STA Funding More than Doubles from Current Year Following current law that reflects both a change in how Proposition 42 funds are allocated and guidance from last year’s budget, STA funding will increase by $427 million over last year’s $316 level to $743 million (a 135 percent increase). Specific Bay Area numbers are included in the table in Attachment A. Proposition 42 Fully Funded Table 1 on the following page indicates the funding level for the various Proposition 42 programs. FY 2007-08 was the last year of allocations to the Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) and the last year that cities and counties had to forego funding for local streets and roads. The end of the TCRP will mean much greater funding levels for transit, local streets and roads and the STIP. STA Funding More than Doubles from Current YearFollowing current law that reflects both a change in how Proposition 42 funds are allocated and guidance from last year’s budget, STA funding will increase by $427 million over last year’s $316 level to $743 million (a 135 percent increase). Specific Bay Area numbers are included in the table in Attachment A (PDF). Proposition 42 Fully FundedTable 1 below indicates the funding level for the various Proposition 42 programs. FY 2007-08 was the last year of allocations to the Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) and the last year that cities and counties had to forego funding for local streets and roads. The end of the TCRP will mean much greater funding levels for transit, local streets and roads and the STIP. Table 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Program | Proposition 42 | Proposition 42 Loan Repayment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
Traffic Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) |
0 |
82.5 |
82.5 |
Local Streets and Roads* |
594 |
N/A |
594 |
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)* |
594 |
N/A |
594 |
Public Transportation Account |
297 |
.5 |
297.5 |
Total Proposition 42 Revenues |
1,485 |
83 * |
1,568 |
*General Fund loans repaid from Spillover funds
With regard to Proposition 1B implementation the news is generally good. A total of $4.7 billion is budgeted, as shown in the table below:
Proposition 1B Bond Program ($ millions) |
2007-08 Actual | 2008-09 Proposal |
|---|---|---|
Corridor Mobility Improvement Account |
608 |
1,547 |
Public Transportation Modernization |
600 |
350 |
State Transportation Improvement Account |
727 |
1,186 |
Trade Corridors |
0 |
500 |
State Local Partnership |
0 |
200 |
State Highway Operation and Protection Program |
403 |
216 |
Rail Grade Separations/Local Seismic |
123 |
86 |
State Highway 99 |
14 |
108 |
Intercity Rail |
188 |
73 |
Local Streets and Roads |
950 |
0 |
School Bus Retrofit |
193 |
.4 |
Air Quality |
250 |
250 |
Transit Security |
101 |
101 |
Port Security |
41 |
85 |
Total |
$4,198 |
$4,702.4 |
In addition to Proposition 1B, the budget proposes to appropriate $717 million for Proposition 1C, the housing bond. This includes $200 million proposed for the regional Planning and Infill Incentive Program and $95 million for the new Transit-Oriented Development Incentive Program administered by the Department of Housing and Community Development.
One bit of bad news was the proposal to postpone until September 2008 the monthly transfer of gas tax receipts used to repair local streets and roads. This action would allow the state to meet its cash flow needs at the expense of local government.
The budget proposes to provide $1.2 million to the California High Speed Rail Authority for its operations expenses, same as last year. However, last year the California High Speed Rail Authority received $15.5 million for capital improvements and this year’s budget reduced that to zero.
Typically, budget subcommittee hearings covering transportation begin in late March to early April, followed by the Governor’s May Revise. Given the overall negative tone of the state budget and the significant cuts proposed therein, it is likely that transportation funding will be considered to help address budget shortfalls at some point during the upcoming year.
Thus, we will need to remain vigilant in protecting transportation funding in the extremely difficult budget environment facing Sacramento this session.
Contacts • Accessibility Information • Site Help
info@mtc.ca.gov • Report Web site comments
Metropolitan Transportation Commission • 101 Eighth Street, Oakland, California 94607
Phone:
510.817.5700, Fax: 510.817.5848
This page was last modified Monday April 14, 2008
© 2008 MTC